August 11, 2025
2 min read
The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) redefines and expands the concept of “sharing” personal information, primarily in the context of cross-context behavioral advertising. The statutory language specifies that to “share, shared, or sharing” means: “renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by the business to a third party for cross-context behavioral advertising, whether or not for monetary or other valuable consideration” (Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140(ah)(1)). This marks a significant extension beyond the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which focused mainly on “sale” as the transfer of data for monetary consideration.
Analysis of the CPRA’s definition shows that:
Results from reviewing operational implications demonstrate that:
The distinction between “sale” and “share” under CPRA becomes clear in practice: “sale” relates to data exchanged for value, while “share” encompasses a broader set of disclosures specifically for cross-context behavioral advertising. Entities cannot avoid obligations by structuring transactions as non-monetary if they involve third-party advertising.
In summary, CPRA’s treatment of “sharing” reflects a shift toward greater consumer protection and transparency in digital advertising ecosystems. Data transfers to third parties for targeted ads—whether or not money changes hands—fall squarely within regulatory scrutiny. This compels organizations to reassess their data flows and adjust compliance strategies accordingly (IAPP, 2023; Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.140).